<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: art-yes or no. The philthosa/destruction model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philthosophy.com/2008/04/26/art-yes-or-no-the-philthosadestruction-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philthosophy.com/2008/04/26/art-yes-or-no-the-philthosadestruction-model/</link>
	<description>melbourne art happenings and musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anal Rabies</title>
		<link>http://www.philthosophy.com/2008/04/26/art-yes-or-no-the-philthosadestruction-model/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Anal Rabies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philthosa.com/?p=71#comment-5</guid>
		<description>What i like with this method is the exponential increase in interest that results from 2 or more participants overlapping/contradictory judgements. While the binary value-judgement of one viewer is not to be undermined, with two/three/four/more people it becomes interesting to record each persons result - totally worthy of extended anal analysis. 
Hypothetical Question - If all participants give it a yes (or no), does that make it good art? Or are they all just really lame douchebag critics with no discerning taste &amp; low low standards..?
And how many otherwise solid relationships &amp; friendships will be destroyed when there is disagreement about the yes-ness or no-ness of a work. I reckon lots. 
Regards, Anal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What i like with this method is the exponential increase in interest that results from 2 or more participants overlapping/contradictory judgements. While the binary value-judgement of one viewer is not to be undermined, with two/three/four/more people it becomes interesting to record each persons result &#8211; totally worthy of extended anal analysis.<br />
Hypothetical Question &#8211; If all participants give it a yes (or no), does that make it good art? Or are they all just really lame douchebag critics with no discerning taste &amp; low low standards..?<br />
And how many otherwise solid relationships &amp; friendships will be destroyed when there is disagreement about the yes-ness or no-ness of a work. I reckon lots.<br />
Regards, Anal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.philthosophy.com/2008/04/26/art-yes-or-no-the-philthosadestruction-model/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philthosa.com/?p=71#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yes&quot;. (i feel it may be possible to utilise the p/d model in other contexts, if it is not in fact, universal.. genius..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yes&#8221;. (i feel it may be possible to utilise the p/d model in other contexts, if it is not in fact, universal.. genius..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
